| Team | Played | Wins | Losses | For | Against | Diff. | Points | WR*1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Nadia van Zon | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 12 | 100% |
| 2. Pirthika Thavendran | 4 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 75% |
| 3. Matilda Lynn | 4 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 6 | 50% |
| 4. Mia Sundernathan | 4 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 3 | 25% |
| 5. Layla Hassan | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 0 | 0% |
The ladder is correct based on any results that are available.
1 The WR column is a Win Ratio. It calculates the number of points
received, out of the number of points possible, and is the basis for ranking the
ladders. It is a fair measure, especially if
teams do not play an equal number of games.
| Matilda Lynn | Pirthika Thavendran | Layla Hassan | Nadia van Zon | Mia Sundernathan | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Matilda Lynn |
Pirthika Thavendran won!
0 — 3
|
Matilda Lynn won!
2 — 3
|
Nadia van Zon won!
3 — 0
|
Matilda Lynn won!
3 — 2
|
|
| Pirthika Thavendran |
Pirthika Thavendran won!
0 — 3
|
Pirthika Thavendran won!
3 — 2
|
Nadia van Zon won!
0 — 3
|
Pirthika Thavendran won!
2 — 3
|
|
| Layla Hassan |
Matilda Lynn won!
2 — 3
|
Pirthika Thavendran won!
3 — 2
|
Nadia van Zon won!
0 — 3
|
Mia Sundernathan won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Nadia van Zon |
Nadia van Zon won!
3 — 0
|
Nadia van Zon won!
0 — 3
|
Nadia van Zon won!
0 — 3
|
Nadia van Zon won!
3 — 0
|
|
| Mia Sundernathan |
Matilda Lynn won!
3 — 2
|
Pirthika Thavendran won!
2 — 3
|
Mia Sundernathan won!
3 — 0
|
Nadia van Zon won!
3 — 0
|
